The Wind Challenge: Why Tall Towers Tremble

High-rise communication towers face an invisible enemy: wind-induced vibrations. As towers grow taller to support 5G/6G antennas, their natural vibration frequencies align more closely with wind excitation frequencies—triggering resonance that amplifies stress by 200–400%. Traditional lattice towers combat this with sheer mass, but in mountainous or coastal sites, this approach becomes costly and logistically impractical. Enter the 3-Legged Tubular Steel Tower: an elegantly engineered solution that turns structural geometry into a wind-conquering weapon.

---

---

1. The Tri-Tube Design: Geometry as a Vibration Dampener

Core Innovation: Triangular Truss + Auxiliary Frames

The patent-pending 3-leg tubular tower (CN 221942102 U) comprises three key elements:

1. Triangular Base Frame: Three support columns arranged in an equilateral triangle, creating inherent torsional rigidity.

2. Variable Root Spread: The base widens at lower heights (e.g., 10m spacing) and narrows toward the top, optimizing load distribution.

3. Auxiliary Cross-Bracing: Diagonal frames connecting adjacent columns at intervals, forming localized "stiffness rings" (Figure 1).

4.  

Why Triangles Win

• Reduced Natural Vibration Period: Auxiliary frames lower the tower's natural frequency from 2.5–3.0s (traditional lattice) to 1.2–1.8s, pushing it away from dangerous wind resonance ranges (0.8–2.0s).

• Stress Diffusion: Diagonal bracing redistributes wind shear forces across multiple nodes, cutting peak stress at joints by 35%.

---

 

2. Wind Load Reduction: The Science Behind 20% Lower Costs

Decoding Wind Vibration Coefficient (β)

Wind-induced vibration force follows:

F_w = β \cdot \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 \cdot A  

Where:

• β = Wind vibration coefficient (lower is better)

• ρ = Air density

• v = Wind speed

• A = Tower surface area

3-eg tubular towers slash β by 40% through two mechanisms:

1. 1. Vortex Disruption: Triangular columns break up coherent wind vortices.

2. 2. Damped Oscillation: Auxiliary frames absorb kinetic energy via micro-yielding.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Proof

A simulation comparing a 45m tri-tube tower vs. lattice tower in Fujian's typhoon zone (55 m/s winds) revealed:

• 1. Wind Vibration Coefficient: β = 1.25 (tri-tube) vs. 2.10 (lattice)

• 2. Peak Stress: 182 MPa vs. 291 MPa

• 3. Material Savings: 28% less steel required

---

---

3. Cost Impact: From Load Reduction to ROI Boost

Case Study: Border Mountain Deployment

A 3-leg tubular tower deployed in China's Yuan border (terrain: rocky, avg. wind 30 m/s) achieved:

Metric	Tri-Tube Tower	Traditional Tower
Foundation Cost	$18K	$35K (deeper piles)
Steel Tonnage	12.5 tons	17.2 tons
Installation Time	8 days	15 days
Total Savings	42%	—